The flow of information is a conceptual timeline of how information is created, disseminated, and found. Information is dispersed through a variety of channels. Depending on the type of information, the time it takes to reach its audience could range from seconds to minutes, days to weeks, or months to years. Knowing how information flows helps you understand what types of information you need and how to search and obtain the targeted information.
Report of Experiment or Phenomena | Time Frame | Review Process | Where to Look | Written by | Audience |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
News (Internet / TV / Radio Services / Newspapers) | Seconds/Minutes | No formal peer-review process | Websites TV news newspapers |
Journalists | General public |
Magazines (print and online) | Days / Weeks | No formal peer-review process | Article Databases Library catalog |
Professional journalists, science writers | General public to knowledgeable layperson |
Conference Proceedings | Presented immediately, sometimes published 1-2 years later | Possible peer-review |
Article Databases |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs, graduate students, post-docs | Scholars, specialists, and grad students |
Journal articles (print and electronic) |
Average 3-9 months | Formal peer-review process | Library catalog Article databases Journal website Google Scholar |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs, graduate students, post-docs | Scholars, specialists, and students |
Review articles | Average 1-2 years | Formal peer-review process |
Article databases |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs, graduate students, post-docs | Scholars, specialists, and students |
Technical Reports and Government Documents | Months to years | No formal peer-review process |
Technical report databases |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs, graduate students, post-docs | Audience varies depending on document or report |
Books, E-books | Average 1-3 years | Editorial process, not peer-review |
Library catalog |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs | General public to specialists |
Reference Sources, Encyclopedias | Average 10 years | Editorial process, not peer-review |
Library catalog |
Specialists in the field, usually scientists or engineers with PhDs | General public to specialists |
Websites and Blogs | Seconds/minutes to years | none | Web search tools | Anyone | General public to Specialists |
Who is the author?
Are they an expert in the field? An eyewitness? Is it a primary or secondary source?
Who are the publishers/researchers/fundraisers? Look for an “About Us” tab or similar.
Beware of anonymous authors or use of vague phrases like, “sources say”
Does the source cover multiple perspectives on an issue in a neutral manner?
OR does it seem like the author is trying to sell you something or convince you of something?
Is the material relevant to your topic? Can you easily explain it to someone else?
Is the information supported by evidence? Was it evaluated or peer reviewed before publication?
Are there any spelling or grammatical mistakes?
Is the information still current or has the information in your source become outdated?
For websites, check for broken links as an indicator if the page has not been maintained over time.