"The Case Against Patents"Introduction: "The case against patents can be summarized briefly: there is no empirical evidence that they serve to increase innovation and productivity, unless productivity is identified with the number of patents awarded—which, as evidence shows, has no correlation with measured productivity. This disconnect is at the root of what is called the 'patent puzzle': in spite of the enormous increase in the number of patents and in the strength of their legal protection, the U.S. economy has seen neither a dramatic acceleration in the rate of technological progress nor a major increase in the levels of research and development expenditure." Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine, "The Case Against Patents," Journal of Economic Perspectives (vol. 27, no. 1), Winter 2013, pp. 3-22