A systematic review aims to capture as many relevant studies (studies are considered data for systematic reviews) as possible as well as to minimize bias. Searching for data for a systematic review is very different than standard database searching. Instead of looking for a short list of "the most appropriate" citations, you're attempting to cast a very wide net in hopes of finding as much relevant data as possible.
Use the PICO framework from the Frame Your Question section to build robust sets of synonyms and controlled vocabularies for your PICO elements. Below is a simplified version of this process for the question "Which is better for treating fever in children, acetaminophen or ibuprofen?" using PubMed.
Concepts | Controlled Vocabulary | Keywords | Search Strategy | |
P | Children | "Child"[Mesh], "Child, Preschool"[Mesh], "Adolescent"[Mesh], "Infant"[Mesh], "Infant, Newborn"[Mesh], "Pediatrics"[Mesh] | child, children, pediatrics, infant, toddler | "Child"[Mesh] OR "Child, Preschool"[Mesh] OR "Adolescent"[Mesh] OR "Infant"[Mesh] OR "Infant, Newborn"[Mesh] OR child* OR pediatric* OR infant OR toddler |
I | Acetaminophen | "Acetaminophen"[Mesh] | Panadol, Tylenol, Acetaminophen | "Acetaminophen"[Mesh] OR Panadol OR Tylenol OR Acetaminophen |
C | Ibuprofen | "Ibuprofen"[Mesh] | Advil, Motrin, ibuprofen | "Ibuprofen"[Mesh] OR Advil OR Motrin OR ibuprofen |
O | Reduced Fever | "Fever"[Mesh] | fever, hyperpyrexia, pyrexia | "Fever"[Mesh] OR fever OR hyperpyrexia OR pyrexia |
The final PubMed search strategy will look like this:
("Child"[Mesh] OR "Child, Preschool"[Mesh] OR "Adolescent"[Mesh] OR "Infant"[Mesh] OR "Infant, Newborn"[Mesh] OR child* OR pediatric* OR infant OR toddler) AND ("Acetaminophen"[Mesh] OR Panadol OR Tylenol OR Acetaminophen) AND ("Ibuprofen"[Mesh] OR Advil OR Motrin OR ibuprofen) AND ("Fever"[Mesh] OR fever OR hyperpyrexia OR pyrexia)
At the very minimum, at least the three databases listed below in "Recommended Databases" should be used.
Citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites. Also searches NCBI's integrated molecular biology databases, including nucleotide sequences, protein sequences, 3-D protein structure data, population study data sets, and assemblies of complete genomes in an integrated system. Note: This link uses a special address which turns on Get it at UC. Without that, PubMed does not link to UCLA's online subscriptions.
PLEASE NOTE: Searching PubMed is equivalent to searching Ovid Medline - don't use both databases in the same review.A collection of six databases designed to inform healthcare decision-making: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Methodology Register (CMR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA), and NHS Economic Evaluation Database (EED). It is an important resource for systematic reviews.
In systematic reviews, using a multidisciplinary platform such as Web of Science will help you ensure you're not missing content that isn't indexed in specialty databases. Web of Science covers databases from many disciplines and indexes major journals with all cited references captured. Combines the following citation databases: Science Citation Index Expanded; Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI); Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index.
Campbell, Sandy. Filter to Retrieve Studies Related to Animals from the OVID Medline Database. John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta. Rev. February 26, 2020.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mpqZsuCPCbCxmFUf5ndjIUaCCbyu-UmMyWlGGydVgwE/edit
Campbell, Sandy. Filter to Retrieve Studies Related to Watchful Waiting from the Ovid MEDLINE Database. John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta. Rev. November 26, 2015.
http://guides.library.ualberta.ca/ld.php?content_id=14026757
Every systematic review requires authors document at least one search strategy (though if you're allowed the space, including more strategies makes your review more replicable). information that should be included is:
Grey (or gray) literature is loosely described as "anything that is not a journal or a book." This leaves a wide range of resources, from advocacy reports to conference proceedings to government documents to trial registries. The sources you choose to examine will be determined by the subject and nature of your systematic review project.
The value of grey literature is that it allows for inclusion of non-published data. There can be a bias in publication to show positive results, or to show significant effect. However, sometimes experiments result in negative or mixed results. This data is just as valuable, but is not as frequently published, and looking at conference proceedings or trial registries will help your project come closer to truth than only examining published literature.
It is important to look outside of information published in databases in order to reduce publication bias - which is described both as journals encouraging novel research and discouraging negative results, and authors self-censoring by not submitting negative results for publication. Several manuals including the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA for systematic review protocol recommend and incorporate the use of grey literature searching.
A multidisciplinary database, with searchable author abstracts, covering the journal literature of most disciplines. Indexes major journals with all cited references captured. Combines the following citation databases: Science Citation Index Expanded; Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI); Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI); Conference Proceedings Citation Index.
Provides citations to papers presented at worldwide conferences, symposia, meetings, expositions, workshops, and congresses, from 1993 on, in a wide variety of disciplines, including the arts, humanities, social sciences, physical and life sciences.